ECFA HL-LHC Workshop Aix-Les Bains , October 1-3, 2013 Burkhard Schmidt, CERN

Publish in

Documents

4 views

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 32
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Description
Technology and R&D S ummary and Next Steps. ECFA HL-LHC Workshop Aix-Les Bains , October 1-3, 2013 Burkhard Schmidt, CERN. General Remarks. It is not possible to summarize all the on-going R&D here – only some aspects. Focus will be on Technology R&D, not on system aspects.
Transcript
Technology and R&DSummary and Next StepsECFA HL-LHC Workshop Aix-Les Bains, October 1-3, 2013Burkhard Schmidt, CERNGeneral Remarks
  • It is not possible to summarize all the on-going R&D here – only some aspects. Focus will be on Technology R&D, not on system aspects.
  • To address the enormous challenges of operating particle detectors in the High Luminosity LHC environment, collaborative efforts across the experiments are important, in particular in the early phases of the projects.
  • Synergies
  • Common R&D facilities:
  • Test beam and irradiation facilities are important to carry out the R&D program and to qualify the technologies under consideration.
  • General Remarks SystemsR&D collaborations and GroupsRD 50 collaboration (rad. hard semiconductors)Cooling: PH-DT and ext. collaboratorsRD52 collaboration(Dual-Readout Calorimetry)CALICE collaboration (Calo. for linear coll.)RD 51 collaboration Micro-Pattern Gas Detectors TechnologiesCommon Electronics Projects, ACESRD 53 collaboration (Dev. of Pixel Readout IC) TDAQ teams of the experimentsPH-SFT group and ext. collaborators
  • Tracking Systems
  • Calorimetry
  • Muon Systems
  • Electronics and Readout Systems
  • Trigger/DAQ/ Offline/ Computing
  • Tracking SystemsTracking System UpgradesALICE and LHCb:
  • New trackers have to cope with much higher event rates.
  • ATLAS and CMS Outer Trackers:
  • Large procurement (2×~200 m2) with the same timeline
  • Difficult to find vendors with suitable production capacity and quality
  • Possibility of production on 8” wafers needs to be explored
  • Requires dedicated R&D – and may bring substantial financial saving
  • ATLAS and CMS pixels:
  • Radiation will increase to > 1016neqcm-2
  • common activities to develop radiation hard sensors within the RD50 collaboration
  • Operational requirements more demanding
  • High pile-up requires enhanced functionalities
  • Main goal of tracker upgrades:
  • Achieve enhanced radiation tolerance
  • and improved performance.
  • Sensor R&D: Planar SensorsPetraRiedlerPlanar sensor R&D:
  • Improved radiation hardness
  • Use of n-in-p sensors, which deplete from the segmented side. Under-depleted operation possible.
  • Optimization of sensor thickness to reduce leakage current (and material) (LHCb VELO 200μm sensors)
  • Optimization of design, e.g. bias structures, isolation
  • Development of slim-edge and edgeless sensors
  • Reduced edge allows for better overlap with less material
  • Several techniques under study
  • Sensor R&D: 3D sensorsBoth electrode types are processed inside the detector bulk
  • Max. drift and depletion distance set by electrode spacing
  • Allows reduced collection time and depletion voltage
  • Potentially the option with highest radiation hardness
  • Production time and complexity to be investigated for larger scale production
  • Could be the optimal choice for inner regions of ATLAS and CMS pixel detectors
  • Used in ATLAS IBL
  • Sensor R&D : MAPS on CMOS processAfter irradiation with 1013neqcm-2Combine sensor and electronics in one chip
  • No interconnection needed
  • Small cell size – high granularity
  • Very low material budget
  • Limited radiation tolerance < 1013neqcm-2
  • Readout time ~100 μs (rolling shutter architecture)
  • Fake hit rate due to diffusion of charge carriers
  • Critical issues have been addressed for ALICE ITS upgrade
  • monolithic pixels have been chosen as baseline
  • Ongoing R&D :
  • Moving to smaller CMOS node to improve
  • radiation tolerance
  • Optimization of architectures –
  • higher speed: < 1μs
  • CMOS process with deep p-well shielding of the
  • collection diode for more complex electronics Reduce fake hit rate Thermal management Bart VerlaatLHCb VELO upgrade
  • Thermal management is of
  • unprecedented importance and difficulty in the HL-LHC trackers
  • On-detector thermal management
  • requires novel materials and solutions to achieve better performance and higher radiation tolerance
  • “known solutions” need to be re-qualified
  • Novel solutions for small areas:
  • micro-channel cooling, very compact
  • CO2cooling is the chosen technology
  • Positive experience with LHCb VELO;
  • ATLAS IBL and CMS Pixel systems under construction
  • Large step forward needed for the ATLAS/CMS phase-2 trackers
  • Centralized development for the cooling plants is a must; organization already in place, centered at CERN in PH-DT.
  • Vigorous R&D effort needed for the development of small CO2pumps
  • Development of a compact mobile CO2 cooler (like Traci)
  • Scintillating fibre tracker R&D C. JoramLarge scale SciFi tracker for LHCbSiPMlocationSiPM readout3 stations of X-U-V-X scintillating fibre planes (≤5° stereo). Every plane is made of 5 layers of 2.5 m long Ø250 mm fibres,.Fn = 6·1011 cm-2fibre ends mirroredSiPM readout2 x ~ 2.5 m4 layer proto mat2 x ~3 m
  • Challenges
  • Large size – high precision
  • O(10’000 km) of fibres
  • Operation of SiPM at -40°C
  • 250 mm pitchSiPM array (HPK)NpeS = ~10-20 pech. #CalorimetersSampling Calorimeter R&D Pawel De Barbaro
  • Development of a radiation tolerant Crystal sampling calorimeter
  • (to replace CMS EC ECAL PbWO4 crystals)
  • E.g. Shashlikconfiguration, using wavelength shifting fibers (WLS) in quartz capillaries with a short light path in scintillator and WLS
  • reduced sensitivity to radiation
  • Ongoing R&D:
  • rad-tolerant crystal scintillators (LYSO, YSO, Cerium Fluoride)
  • WLS fibres in quartz capillaries
  • rad-tolerant photo-detectors (e.g. GaInP)
  • Development of radiation tolerant Plastic/Scint. calorimeter
  • (to replace CMS EC HCAL)
  • Change layout of tile calorimeter using WLS fibres within scintillator to shorten the light path length
  • Ongoing R&D:
  • rad-tolerant version of scintillator material (yellow emitting 3HF)
  • WLS fibreswith quartz capillaries
  • Integrated ECAL/HCAL R&D
  • High granularity Particle flow / Imaging Gas Calorimetry (CALICE)
  • high segmentation (transv.andlongit.) to measure shower topology
  • Challenges and R&D:
  • high rate capability of gas detectors
  • large number of channels (~ 107)
  • compact and inexpensive electronics, low power 40 MHz ADC, cooling
  • development of high speed data links (10 Gbps) to transport large volumes of data
  • Dual ReadOut with Cerenkov/Scint. sampling detector (DREAM, RD52)
  • Ongoing R&D:
  • Quartz fibers:
  • Cerenkov radiator for Dual Readout
  • Doped Quartz fibers for scintillation signal in Dual Readout Calorimeter
  • Crystal fibers:
  • doped inorganic crystal fibers, e.g. LuAG for scintillation light detection
  • UndopedLuAG for Cerenkov light detection
  • Calorimeter Electronics UpgradeArno SträssnerKey enabling technologies:
  • On-detector front-end electronics with sufficient resolution and large dynamic range (~16-bit)
  • COTS vs. ASIC development.
  • If ASIC – what technology should be used
  • across the experiments at least 5-6 developments using different processes
  • Try to identify synergies across the experiments
  • Example: ATLAS LAr CalorimeterThe common trend is to design a readout architecture where:
  • the data are not buffered in the front-end, but rather streamed off-detector at 40 MHz
  • fast pre-processors convert raw-data into calibrated information that feed the trigger system where improved and more complex algorithms are applied.
  • Off-detector buffers allow for a much higher trigger latency or purely software-based triggers.
  • Custom pre-amp, signal shaping and delay ASIC: re-prototyped in cost-effective IHP technology Custom ADC developments: NEVIS / PEALL12-bit ADC, IBM 130nm CMOS Muon SystemsGEM Detector R&D Marcello Abrescia
  • Triple GEM detectors have been used successfully in LHCb
  • (after ~10 years of R&D)
  • Main challenge now :
  • build large systems (CMS and ALICE)
  • larger foils, made with single sided etching technique
  • Industrialize production
  • Ongoing R&D:
  • Performance studies
  • time and space resolution
  • Longevity
  • ageing tests at GIF and GIF++
  • Stretching of foils without spacers
  • Allows reopening of chambers
  • New GEM detector applicationsALICE TPC:
  • Replace wire chambers with quadruple-GEMs
  • MWPC not compatible with 50 kHz operation because of ion backflow in the field cage
  • Choice of quadruple-GEM detectors to minimize ion backflow ( < 1 % )
  • GEMs for calorimetry:
  • Digital calorimetry approach:
  • Cell is either ON or OFF
  • High granularity for charged particle tracking
  • 1x1 cm2cells proposed
  • Requires development of Particle Flow algorithm
  • Good correlation between particle energy
  • and numbers of cells hitsGEMMicromega Detector R&D
  • Micromegas have been chosen as precision measurement and trigger detectors of the New Small Wheels of ATLAS
  • First large system based on Micromegas
  • Detector dimensions: 1.5–2.5 m2
  • A total of ~1200 m2 of detection layers
  • ‘Floating mesh’ technique used for chamber construction
  • Breakthroughs and on-going R&D:
  • Resistive strips to reduce discharges
  • µTPC operation mode to get good spatial resolution for inclined tracks
  • 3D view of the first large (1 x 2.4 m2) MM chamberR&D to Improve RPC (iRPC)Main goal: Improve rate capability
  • Reduce the electrode resistivity
  • “low” resisitivity (1010Ωcm) glass (lowestresistivity usable 107Ωcm)
  • Needs important R&D on electrode materials
  • Change the detector configuration
  • Go to ‘double-triple gap’ option
  • Improves the ratio:
  • induced signal/charge in the gap
  • Rate capability ~ 30 kHz/cm2
  • Time resolution 20-30 ps
  • Change the operating conditions
  • reduces the charge/avalanche,
  • part of the needed amplification transferred from gas to FE electronics
  • Needs an improved detector shielding against electronic noise
  • Improvedelectronics“Standard” electronicsElectronicsIC designs and HD interconnectsA. MarchioroJ. ChristiansenOn-detector electronics 100% custom made with highly specialized complex ASICs that must work reliably in unprecedented hostile radiation environments for many years.
  • ASICs in 130 nm – good progress already, but still a lot of work ahead
  • ASICs in 65 nm new for HEP – huge amount of work, including special radiation qualification for extreme conditions (ATLAS/CMS pixels)
  • Must be a collaborative effort –
  • RD53 establishedIncreased channel densities makes High Density Interconnect (HDI) technologies increasingly critical
  • High density interconnects:
  • hybrid substrates, bump-bonding, Through Silicon Vias (TSV)…
  • Investigate and qualify vendors with suitable products, interested in our volumes and budgets
  • Often project-specific. Share information and experience.
  • Use of TSVPower Distribution R&D Peter Phillips
  • Two main power strategies being explored for the HL-LHC
  • Serial Powering
  • DC-DC Buck converters
  • In addition
  • Switched capacitor DC-DC
  • Necessary to continue work on all
  • Overall efficiencies of > 80% can be obtained
  • Continued support is needed to deliver suitable parts in time
  • Bulk supplies
  • Evaluation of larger Serially Powered systems
  • Low mass DC-DC Buck Converters with increased radiation tolerance
  • Identification of “HV” switch transistors for sensor bias applications
  • Example Serial Powering:
  • ATLAS Strip staves
  • Ex. DC-DC buck converter
  • CMS Pixel upgradeOV2.5V5V7.5V10VModular Electronics Jean-Pierre CachemicheExample: ATLAS Calorimeter Trigger Topological Processor Card
  • xTCA and its sub-standards:
  • ATCA (2002): ATLAS, LHCb, ILC, …
  • μTCA (2006): CMS, XFEL
  • favoured candidate as successor of VME
  • Tight roadmap to define and test common developments
  • Next steps:
  • Manpower and tools needed to develop common solutions and support them
  • Raising the competence of developers community will take time
  • Many coordinating actions already started, but lots to be done
  • xTCA Interest Group should play a major role
  • Alternatively development of high bandwidth system based on PCIxcards in “commodity” PCs to interface detector specific front-end to DAQ systems on a switched-network.
  • High speed Link R&D Francois Vasey
  • High speed links (≳10 Gbps) are the umbilical cords of the experiments
  • Meeting the HL-LHC challenge requires:
  • Qualifying new technologies and components
  • Designing electronics, interconnects, packages and perhaps even optoelectronics
  • Maintaining expertise, tools and facilities
  • Investing heavily with a few selected industrial partners
  • The community is healthy, but small and fragmented. Manpower is the bottleneck.
  • Development time remains very long (~6y) in comparison to industry.
  • HL-LHC environment is unique and requires specific R&D and qualification procedures.
  • Shrinking of GBT package size to smaller footprint
  • Exploratory Project on Si-photonics for HEP applications
  • VTRxSF-VTRxTrigger / DAQ / Offline / ComputingTechnology Trends Niko Neufeld TDAQ and ComputingHEP profit from industrial developments
  • We expect current performance rates (and price performance improvements) will hold at least until 2020
  • 25% performance improvement per year in computing at constant cost.
  • Only if our efficiency in using the resources
  • remains constant as well!
  • Local area network and link technology show a similar trend as processors.
  • 20% price-drop per year at constant capacity expected for disk-storage.
  • Far beyond LS2 the technical challenges for further evolution seem daunting.
  • Nevertheless, the proven ingenuity and creativity of IT justifies cautious optimism.
  • Trigger Developments Wesley Smith2.000k Logical CellsAssociative memories for pattern matching
  • Tracking Triggers
  • ATLAS: L1 trigger at 500KHz within 20 μs; ‘pull path’
  • CMS: L1 trigger at 40MHz within 10-20μs; ‘push path’
  • Challenges:
  • Complex pattern recognition over very large channel counts with short latency and no dead time (clock/event pipelined).
  • Highly challenging connectivity and processing problem
  • Tools:
  • Pattern Recognition Associative Memory (PRAM)
  • Match and majority logic to associate hits in different detector layers to a set of pre-determined hit patterns
  • highly flexible/configurable
  • Pattern recognition finishes soon after hits arrive
  • Challenges:
  • Increase pattern density by 2 orders of magnitude
  • Increase speed x 3 (latency)
  • Use 3D architecture:Vertically Integrated Pattern Recognition AM - VIPRAM
  • FPGAs:
  • Challenges:
  • Latest generation FPGAs create complex placement issues
  • Designs must be heavily floor-planned similar to ASIC layout
  • Embedded Processors, moving tasks from FPGA to SW design
  • Trends in HLT & DAQ Wesley Smith
  • Event building architectures for
  • cost effective large bandwidth networks are required
  • Profit from progress in PC evolution for PC server architecture
  • Tools:
  • HLT Specialized Track Processing
  • Various options, e.g.GPU.
  • Depends on resources available, CPUand link speed
  • Use of New Processors in HLT
  • ARM, Nvidia Tesla (GPU), Xeon Phi…
  • HLT on the Cloud
  • e.g. share resources between HLT & Tier-O
  • Merging of HLT & offline software development
  • Trends in Computing PredragBuncic
  • Resources needed for Computing at the HL-LHC are large – but not unprecedented.
  • Development of the WLCG was a great success.
  • Experiments are proposing to build very large computing online facilities that could be potentially used for offline computing.
  • Virtualization and Clouds may help
  • reducing the complexity of the Grid middleware
  • fully utilizing resources.
  • Cloud federation may be a way to build our next Grid
  • Virtualization is the key technology behind the CloudSoftware Trends David Rousseau
  • Future evolution of processors: many cores with less memory per core, more sophisticated processor instructions (micro-parallelism),
  • Parallel framework to distribute algorithms to cores
  • Optimization of software to use high level processor instructions
  • LHC experiments software has more than 15 million lines of code, written by more than 3000 people
  • a whole community to embark, starting essentially now
  •  Revisiting code is a good opportunity to share effort and software.
  • We can do much more: http://concurrency.web.cern.ch
  • Concurrent event-processingFinal RemarksThe radiation environment in which the experiments have to operate reliably poses an always greater challenge.Work in the R&D collaborations has been very beneficial for the advancement of many detector technologies. More R&D is needed in relation to the gas mixtures for Muon Systems to reduce or even avoid the use of green house gases.Emphasis has to be more on more on overall system/experiment aspects.Technologies for ASIC design are increasingly complicated to use. Significant R&D manpower and resources are needed at an early stage.There is an increasing integration of the sensors and its electronics in the case of Tracking Systems. In this context the integration of cooling should be considered further for pixel detectors.Technology choices should be made not too late in order to bring conceptual studies to the level of a technical design report and to realize the projects in the time available.The challenges in terms of computing and software design should not be underestimated. More common developments across the experiments are desirable. AcknowledgementsMany thanks to the PG chairs for their advise:Tracking Systems: Ingrid Gregor, Duccio AbbaneoCalorimeters: Francesco Lanni, Marcello MannelliMuonSystems: Marcello Abbrescia, Christoph AmelungElectronics: Philippe Farthouat, Magnus HansenTDOC: David Rousseau, Wesley SmithMany thanks as well to Petra Riegler, Jorgen Christiansen, Christian Joram, David Barney, Pawel De Barbaro, Archana Sharma, Niko Neufeld, Pedrag Buncic for their input and fruitful discussions.
    Related Search
    We Need Your Support
    Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

    Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

    No, Thanks